Scrolling through the homepage of the likes of made.porn is a well-recognized experience to anyone who’s ever visited an adult site. Women – mostly white and slender, and all the time with giant boobs – pose in various states of undress, sometimes engaged in sex acts, sometimes not, sometimes covered in cum, sometimes not. Look closer, though, and there’s something uncanny concerning the photos. Disjointed body parts manifest like Fifa glitches (a disembodied dick here, an additional hand there); facial expression mix clumsily into each other; the identical image appears time and again, every time sporting a latest, barely freakish, head.

On this planet of AI-generated porn, these aren’t especially notable mistakes. Other tries have more in common with Cronenberg’s oeuvre than Riley Reid’s back catalogue (which isn’t to diminish the grotesque sexiness of body horror). They’re also not one of the best on offer.

Last yr, a handful of sophisticated text-to-image models – most famously OpenAI’s DALL-E 2, StabilityAI’s Stable Diffusion, and Midjourney – launched, making an artist, of sorts, out of anyone with a pc. Now you’ll be able to envision any scenario, irrespective of how bizarre, type it out, and these generators will, sometimes relatively realistically, bring it to life. I’ll offer you one guess as to what many individuals typed in first.

Although all of those generators have NSFW content filters (if you input ‘naked woman’ into Stable Diffusion, for instance, it simply generates a black box), users have consistently searched for methods to get around them. Unsurprisingly, they didn’t have to look for long, and, as of recent months, they don’t even have to look particularly hard. Type ‘AI porn generator’ into Google, and a complete host of options present themselves. Among the most famous sites, including Unstable Diffusion and PornPen, launched in August 2022, just weeks after their SFW counterparts.

Now, certain corners of the web are inundated with these explicit images of ladies who don’t exist, in addition to detailed advice on the way to create – and improve – them. Unstable Diffusion’s Discord has over 400,000 members, while Reddit’s r/AIpornhub and r/sdnsfw – which is devoted to NSFW images mostly generated by a hacked version of Stable Diffusion – each have over 100,000. It could actually be a lucrative business, too. To access Porn Pen’s ‘pro mode’, which supplies you quicker, unlimited, and better quality generations, it’ll set you back $15 (£12) a month. Last month, Futurism reported that the positioning had almost 7,000 members, suggesting that PornPen is bringing in over 1,000,000 dollars per yr.

So, what are all these people using it for? PornPen’s anonymous founder told Futurism that folks simply “want to have a look at porn and customise it to their tastes”. That could be so, particularly in the event that they’re generating fetishes which are inconceivable in real life, like monster girls or giantesses. For others, it’s a novelty, and for non-paying users, it’d just be a way of accessing an infinite supply of free pornographic images. For some, though, it’s a money-making scheme.

In recent months, sites like Reddit and BlackHatWorld, a digital marketing forum and marketplace, have seen an uptick in men asking for advice about launching AI models on subscription platforms like OnlyFans and Fansly. If they struggle and fail – which they mostly do, as a consequence of verification processes that require photo ID – these men return to the forums with a latest query. “I’m in search of alternatives to OnlyFans that may allow me to confirm the account with my ID (an old, bald, real man),” one person posted in BlackHatWorld last month. “The goal is to post and monetise adult content generated with AI models (beautiful blonde women who don’t exist).” On the time of writing, no person has replied to the post, but that’s to not say viable alternatives aren’t on the market.

In reality, Sam, a pseudonymous student in his 20s, has apparently found one (he won’t tell me what it’s, though, because “it’s a goldmine and I’d fairly other people not find out about it”). An everyday poster on BlackHatWorld, Sam is the creator of a large number of AI-generated models, all women, whom he employs as adult content creators. Once we speak via Telegram, he’s understandably very cagey. He doesn’t specify what number of models he has, but claims that every of them are averaging around $200 (approx £160) per day.

When he first created his models – using a combination of AI generators and his own coding skills – he attempted to establish accounts for them on OnlyFans and Fansly. Initially, he tried declaring that the models were AI-generated. “We’d verified our OnlyFans account using an actual person and said within the bio that it was AI, but apparently it went against their terms of service,” he explains. It didn’t work out when he tried to pretend the model was real, either. “We tried hiring an actual girl, but our AI model didn’t appear like her in any respect, so when re-verification arose, we were fucked.”

OnlyFans didn’t reply to my request for comment, but in an email statement, Fansly confirmed its policy on AI-generated accounts: “Creators cannot impersonate any individual or entity, real or fictional, without explicit consent. In case your content falls under these categories, it might be removed upon a compliance review.” It seems some slip through the web, though, as a fast search brings up a handful of, admittedly unpopular, accounts of AI-generated women. While a few of these are home to multiple models, others just feature content of the identical woman, like a conventional, human account.

With the latter – whether it’s an adult creator or an AI Instagram influencer – it’s often unclear whether fans, mostly men, know that they’re interacting with a computer-generated person. Lots of these accounts do declare that they’re AI-generated, but that doesn’t stop disgruntled followers from crying ‘scam’ after they finally read the bio.

Having said that, Sam doesn’t declare that his models are artificially generated by a dude, and that, when followers check with them, they’re actually talking to a team of paid chatters. Still, once I ask if he thinks people imagine that the models are real, he says: “They’re men they usually’re horny. After all they imagine the girl is real.” What sells it, he adds, is the videos he’s created. Sam’s models and photos are fictional, but to make the accounts more believable, he buys videos of real-life adult creators after which deepfakes in his AI models’ heads. He says his partner sources the videos from contacts within the adult industry, who know that their faces shall be cut from the footage, but doesn’t specify whether or not they know exactly what the videos are getting used for.

Whether it applies to this particular case or not, sex employees having their content stolen for deepfakes is, sadly, nothing latest – and yet there’s little laws to guard them. Talking to Dazed last yr, adult creator Tanya Tate said: “It’s literally our bodies at work. Deepfakes dehumanise sex employees – they trivialise us to nothing greater than a puppet.”

Despite this, and the proven fact that he’s deceiving his followers, Sam says he doesn’t have any ethical concerns about what he’s doing. “Fake adult creators are here to remain,” he asserts. “I just have the primary mover advantage, which I’m pretty sure shall be gone in a few months. There’s demand out there and we’re not the one supply; we’re not even the superior supply. Real girls still have a bonus, with videos and complicated poses.”

Sam’s right that real adult creators still have the advantage – they usually all the time will. It’s not nearly videos and complicated poses, either. A machine can never reproduce actual sensuality, nor can it offer the human connection that quite a lot of people seek these creators out for. That’s why, despite their area of interest popularity, it’s unfathomable to think about a world through which virtual girlfriends, sex robots, and sex doll brothels replace actual human-to-human intimacy.

That’s to not say AI doesn’t have a spot in the web sex industry; actually, adult creators have long enhanced their photos and videos with AI filters (as have most social media users, à la Daring Glamour), and AI assistants for chatting are prone to be widely adopted on subscription sites. The recent developments just open up more opportunities for creators, including to fulfil even probably the most fantastical, or grotesque, fetishes.

“They’re men they usually’re horny. After all they imagine the girl is real” 

But adult accounts generated by AI should still be controlled by real sex employees. That’s because, even when the generated porn is fake, the generator was still trained on images and videos of real sex employees, all scraped non-consensually from vast web content. As pseudonymous sex employee and peer organiser Frankie points out, it’s greater than somewhat icky, then, if “tech bros are profiting off these giant databases of sex employee output”, and reaping the rewards of online sex work with not one of the real-world consequences that include it. (Although, as Mastercard just updated its policy for adult content to incorporate deepfakes, and Meta extended its ban on adult content to incorporate AI, they might still face financial discrimination, and their models could be subjected to social media censorship and deplatforming, similar to human sex employees.)

While Frankie’s not keen to recommend using these AI generators – “more from a political position than advising people on their hustle,” she explains – she does imagine that sex employees adopting the tools and thus “profiting off stuff trained on them” can only be thing.

One person doing just that’s Sika Moon. Based in Berlin, she’s been working as an adult creator on the likes of OnlyFans, Fansly, and ManyVids since 2018, earning on average €40,000 (approx £34k) a month. At first, she loved it, but eventually she began to search out the work laborious and repetitive. “Running the platforms, chatting to fans, making latest photos and videos for all platforms and social media every single day is a 16-hour-day, seven-days-a-week job,” she explains. “After five years of really good earnings, I made a decision it’s enough and stopped before completely burning out.”

Then, in May, she discovered the potential of AI. “It was an art project at first, and I just posted photos on Instagram,” she explains. “But seeing my fast growth and the support of my fans, I set Sika up as an adult model on platforms like Patreon and Fanvue.” Now, Sika has nearly 200,000 Instagram followers, and just a few hundred on Patreon and Fanvue respectively. Her earnings aren’t as high as they were before, but, as she points out, she’s only been doing it for 4 months.

Sika Moon isn’t based on the actual one that operates her (though the IRL Sika does make one appearance on her Instagram; she’s also experimenting with a latest AI, Shylar Moon, who’s based on her real photos). Relatively, she’s created using a combination of Stable Diffusion, Photoshop, and sweetness apps like FaceApp. Her photos are sometimes made in collaboration with a programmer called Patrick from Frankfurt, who runs the 158k-strong Instagram account @ai.build.art, and sells his skills via Patreon for a monthly fee of £8.50. On the time of writing, he has 150 subscribers, and appears to be popular with most of the big AI-generated adult creators. For instance, Gina Stewart, the “world’s hottest grandma”, who utilises AI to bring back her younger self, of sorts, often uses Patrick’s services, and even worked with him on her recent cover for the AI edition of Autobabes magazine. Sika Moon also features in the difficulty.

Still, the technology is in its infancy, and even when photos are improving, realistic AI videos aren’t possible yet. So as a substitute, form of like Sam, ‘Sika’ uses real videos of herself, friends of hers, or other models with permission, after which renders Sika’s face on the videos. All of this is an element of the fun. “Creating content has suddenly change into a creative process again,” she says. “My audience loves porn, but they now enjoy and appreciate the great thing about my art, too. Knowing I’m an actual girl behind this may occasionally help.”

The latter feels key on the subject of AI porn’s potential success. Even when Sika’s content is essentially computer generated, she’s the one chatting to subscribers, often in a sexual context. “Just posting photos won’t get you anywhere,” says Sika. “The web’s filled with photos. [These tech bros] don’t understand the way to give their dreamgirls a personality, the way to make them feel real, nor the way to connect with their subscribers.”

Without talking to a creator, though, and unless they reveal who they’re, it’s inconceivable to know whether there’s a sex employee behind the new AI girl’s account, or just a few tech-savvy guy. As more of those creators crop up, a culture of suspicion is emerging – and it’s targeting sex employees themselves. “Previously, you could be accused of catfishing, but now that AI is able to generating photos that pass as human, sex employees have been facing accusations of being fake,” says Liara Roux, sex employee, author, and writer of Whore of Recent York. In January, Roux found a 4chan thread that claimed a photograph of her was AI-generated. The anonymous poster had circled portions of the image that ‘proved’ it was fake, and shared it with the caption: ‘Why are we arguing about this AI-generated whore?’ “I’m well-established, so there’s loads of proof of my existence,” Roux tells me. “But, for newer sex employees, it’s tougher.”

“The web’s filled with photos. [These tech bros] don’t understand the way to give their dreamgirls a personality, the way to make them feel real, nor the way to connect with their subscribers” – Sika Moon, adult creator

It’s hard to think about an answer that’ll curb this suspicion. More online censorship targeted at ‘fake’ AI-generated creators will only negatively impact sex employees. Besides, because it does for Sika, AI can offer latest opportunities for adult creators, including anonymity and the fulfilment of inconceivable fantasies – not to say that there’s demand for AI-specific porn – so a crackdown wouldn’t be the reply in the primary place.

As AI tools change into more sophisticated, though, regulations do must be put in place to tackle deepfakes (within the UK, they’re allegedly coming within the Online Safety Bill) – but they need to distinguish between fictional and non-consensual content. Frankie, the sex employee and peer organiser, can be concerned that, like with FOSTA-SESTA within the US, latest laws may goal platforms, versus perpetrators of the latter. “It might be an actual shame if laws targeted sites like Rule 34, as a substitute of a badly run generator, or for fan art to be caught up on this,” she says. “We’d be in a extremely bad place if sexy drawings of, say, Iron Man begin to be criminalised.”

Really, though, the technology is so latest that AI porn remains to be the wild west. Due to this fact, pontificating over the way to discover the intent and authenticity behind AI-generated adult accounts is a idiot’s game. For now, it falls on users to be media literate enough to not be tricked into pondering an AI model is an actual woman, and, in the event that they do want an AI model, to either bear in mind that they might be sexting some random guy, or to go to the trouble to try to discover a creator who’s clearly a sex employee.

Ultimately, real porn by real people will all the time come out because the winner. But, on this fantasy world created by sex employees, what’s real anyway? “AI could be in comparison with a McDonald’s chicken nugget, rigorously engineered to trigger an intense response within the brain, whereas the experience of hiring a high-end sex employee could be more like going to a farm-to-table tremendous dining restaurant,” concludes Roux. “With each experience, there’s a rigorously calibrated performative aspect; the tremendous dining spot is just higher at affecting reality.”

Header image via @ai.construct.art and @deannaritter98

Join Dazed Club and be a part of our world! You get exclusive access to events, parties, festivals and our editors, in addition to a free subscription to Dazed for a yr. Join for £5/month today.